Networks, activism and public mobilizations. Collective and connective action
Mots-clés :
Collective Action, Connective Action, Network Activism, Public Mobilization.Résumé
With the common and dominant use of digital social networks, new communication and collective mobilization practices emerged, as well as new configurations of acting and manifesting in public. In this essay, we ask where collective action begins and ends in relation to the connective action (Bennett and Segerberg, 2012), admitting that these modalities or logics of action can be mitigated, in a hybrid regime. To do this, we begin by understanding communication as both action and participation, then examine collective, situated and public action and finally consider the connective action. We intend to discuss the permeable boundaries between connective action and collective action, with reference to the movement “Que se lixe a Troika” (“To hell with troika!”), which emerged on digital social networks and had protests on the street in the 15th September 2012 and the 2th March 2013. At the same time, the network’s activism and the mobilization in the street are questioned. Therefore, the purpose is to question if the digitally networked action or the connective action, which brings together several users, can constitute a collective action.
Références
Aron, R. (1992). As etapas do pensamento sociológico. Lisboa: Dom Quixote.
Babo, I. (2013). As manifestações na Tunísia e no Egipto em 2010-11. A semântica dos acontecimentos nos media e o papel das redes digitais. Revista Análise Social, 209, XLVIII(4): 792-809. http://analisesocial.ics.ul.pt/?page_id=18
Babo, I. (2015). Espectadores e Públicos Activos. Lisboa: Editora Nova Vega.
Babo, I. (2017). Redes e Ativismo. In I. Babo, J. Bragança de Miranda, M. J. Damasio & M. Di Felice (orgs.), Netactivismo. Lisboa: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
Babo, I. & Silva, C. T. (2015). Public Sphere and Collective Action. the Portuguese Movement of the ‘15th September’. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6 S5): 425-433, dezembro. www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/8580
Babo, I. & Silva, C. T. (2016). Redes sociais e mobilizações públicas. O movimento de 15 de Setembro. Atas do Congresso Internacional Ibero Americano em Investigação Qualitativa, 3: 182-192. http://proceedings.ciaiq.org/2016/index.php/ciaiq2016/issue/archive
Babo, M. A. (2017). Netativismo. Entre a rede e a rua. In I. Babo, J. Bragança de Miranda, M. J. Damasio & M. Di Felice (orgs.), Netactivismo (pp. 127-136). Lisboa: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
Badouard, R. (2013). Les mobilisations de clavier. Le lien hypertexte comme ressource des actions collectives en ligne. Réseaux, Militantisme en réseau, 31(181): 87-117.
Benford, R. & Hunt, S. (2001). Cadrages en conflit. In Raisons Pratiques 12, Les formes de l’action collective (pp. 163-194). Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 739-768. Doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1985 [1966]). A Construção Social da Realidade. Petropolis: Vozes.
Blumer, H. (1969; 1986). Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Cardon, D. (2011). La démocratie internet. Paris: Seuil.
Cardon, D. & Granjon, F. (2013). Médactivistes. Paris: Sciences Po, Les Presses.
Castells, M. (2002). A sociedade em rede. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, España.
Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza: Los movimientos sociales en la era de internet. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Cefaï, D. (1996). La construction des problèmes publics. Définitions de situations dans des arènes publiques. Réseaux, 75: 43-66.
Cefaï, D. (2001). Les cadres de l’action collective. In Raisons Pratiques, 12, Les formes de l’action collective: 51-97. Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Cefaï, D. (2005). Os novos movimentos de protesto em França. A articulação de novas arenas públicas. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 72: 129-160.
Cefaï, D. (2007). Pourquoi se mobilise-t-on? Les théories de l’action collective. Paris : La Découverte.
Cefaï, D. (2009). Como nos mobilizamos? A contribuição de uma abordagem pragmatista para a sociologia da ação coletiva. Dilemas:11-48.
Cefaï, D. & Trom, D. (2005). Retour sur la sociologie des problèmes publics. Un entretien avec Joseph Gusfield. Secret/Public, (0): 209-222.
Dayan, D. (2000). Télévision, le presque-public. Réseaux, 100: 427-456.
Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. [Versão electrónica], Chicago & London: Open Court, 1925; revised edition, New York: Norton, 1929; London: Allen & Unwin.
Dewey, J. (2010 a [1927]). Le public et ses problèmes. Paris: Folio, Gallimard (Traduzido do original inglês The Public and its Problems. In The collected works of John Dewey. The later Works, vol.2, 1925-1927. Southern Illinois University Presse.)
Dewey, J. (2010 b [1934]). L’art comme expérience. Paris: Folio, Gallimard (Traduzido do original inglês Art as experience. In The collected works of John Dewey. The later Works, vol.10, 1934, Southern Illinois University Presse.)
Di Felice, M. (2012). Netativismo: novos aspectos da opinião pública em contextos digitais. Revista Famecos, 19(1): 27-45. Porto Alegre.
Di Felice, M. (2013). Ser redes: o formismo digital dos movimentos net-ativistas. Matrizes, 7(2): 49-71. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Di Felice, M. (2017). Net-ativismo e ecologia da ação em contextos reticulares. In Di Felice, & R. Pereira (orgs.), Net-ativismo. Redes digitais e novas práticas de participação (pp. 13-28). Papirus Editora.
Dubet, F. (1990). Action et autoréflexion. In Raisons Pratiques 1, Les Formes de l’acion (p. 171-193). Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Earl, J. (2017). Possibilitando digitalmente a mudança social: aproveitando affordances e promovendo a mudança. In Di Felice & R. Pereira (orgs.), Net-ativismo. Redes digitais e novas práticas de participação (pp. 53-64). Papirus Editora.
Earl, J. & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
El Oifi, M. (2011). O efeito Al Jazeera. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil. www.diplomatique.org.br/artigo.php?id=936
Fornel, M. & Quéré, L. (1999). Présentation, in Raisons Pratiques 10. La logique des situations: 7-32. Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Garfinkel, H. (1984 [1967]). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, Polity Presse.
Goffman, E. (1973 [1959]). La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne. Paris: Minuit.
Goffman, E. (1974 [1967]). Les rites d’interaction. Paris: Minuit.
Goffman, E. (1991 [1974]). Les cadres de l’expérience. Paris: Minuit.
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems: drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (1986 [1962]). L’Espace Public. Archéologie de la Publicité comme dimension constitutive de la société bourgeoise. Paris: Payot.
Koleva, S. (2013). Espace urbain et action citoyenne: rapports à géométrie variable. In G. Rouet (dir.), Mobilisations citoyennes dans l’espace public (pp. 17-29). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lazega, E. (2014). Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles. Paris: PUF.
Letonturier, E. (coord.) (2012). Les réseaux. Paris: CNRS Éd., Hermès.
Livet, P. (2002). Émotions et rationalité morale. Paris: PUF.
Mercklé, P. (2011). Sociologie des Réseaux sociaux. Paris: La Découverte.
Paperman, P. & Ogien, R. (org.) (1995). La couleur des pensées: sentiments, émotions, intentions, Raisons pratiques. Paris: EHESS.
Pleyers, G. (org.) (2013). Réseaux. Militantisme en réseau, 31, 181.
Quéré, L. & Pharo, P. (dir.) (1990). Les formes de l’action. Sémantique et sociologie. Raisons Pratiques 1. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
Quéré, L. (2003). La structure de l’expérience publique d’un point de vue pragmatiste. In D. Cefaï & I. Joseph (orgs.), L’Héritage du pragmatisme: Conflits d’urbanité et épreuves du civisme. Paris: L’Aube.
Quéré, L. (2015). Prefácio. In I. Babo, Espectadores e Públicos Activos (pp. 5-21). Lisboa: Editora Nova Vega.
Rouet, G. (dir.) (s.d.). Mobilisations citoyennes dans l’espace public. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Schütz, A. (1987). Le Chercheur et le Quotidien. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
Snow, D. (2001). Analyse des cadres et mouvements sociaux. In Raisons Pratiques 12, Les formes de l’action collective (pp. 27-49). Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Snow, D. & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1: 197–217.
Snow, D. A.; Rochford, B. Jr.;Worden, S. K.&Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4): 464-481.
Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834. In M. Traugott (org.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 15-42). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thévenot, L. (1990). L’action qui convient. In P. Pharo & L. Quéré (orgs.), Les formes de l’action (pp. 39-69). Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Trom, D. & Zimmermann, B. (2001). Cadres et institution des problèmes publics. In Raisons Pratiques 12, Les formes de l’action collective (pp. 281-315). Paris: Ed. EHESS.
Wasko, M. M.; Faraj, S & Teigland, R. (2004). Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11-12): 493-513. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1377&context=jais
Weber, M. (1971 [1921]). Économie et société. Paris: Plon.
