Trust and Transparency in the profession and in the strategic communication professionals
Keywords:
public relations practitioners, trust, transparency, organizations, ECM2019Abstract
The theoretical analysis of the concepts of trust and transparency shows the importance of the public relations (PR) professionals in the creation of narratives and processes that contribute to the relationships between organizations and publics, and to the development of trust in these relationships. These professionals seek to ensure access to information, the adequacy of the performance of organizations to the conveyed messages in order to present them and make them perceived as transparent. An empirical study of a deductive nature was developed, using the quantitative method based on massive scale survey – European Communication Monitor (ECM) – 2019. Within the scope of this article, we have pay attention to the answers to the seven questions that address
trust in the public relations and strategic communication professions, trust in communication departments and agencies, personal trust, trust in other communications professionals, trust-building processes in organizations and their challenges, and the transparency of organizations. The results show that both in Portugal and in Europe, personal confidence
is perceived to be higher than that of meso and macro levels. The general perception of confidence in the profession by ordinary people is even the lowest. In terms of transparency, the professionals surveyed report greater difficulty in ensuring transparency about policies and strategies associated with the organization’s leadership, as well as internal processes
and workflows.
References
Albu, O., & Flyverbom, M. (2019). Organizational transparency: Conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. Business & Society, 58(2), 268-297. http://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316659851.
Albu, O., & Wehmeier, S. (2014). Organizational transparency and sense-making: The case of Northern Rock. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.795869.
Ames, C. (2010). PR goes to the movies: The image of public relations improves from 1996 to 2008. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.016.
Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2016). Cegueira moral. A perda da sensibilidade na modernidade líquida. Relógio D’Água.
Bentele, G., & Seidenglanz, R. (2008). Trust and credibility – Prerequisites for communication management. In A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public Relations Research (pp. 49-62). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_4.
Bernstein, E. (2016). Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 217-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0076.
Botan, C. (2018). Strategic communication theory and practice. The cocreational model. Wiley Blackwell.
Callison, C. (2001). Do PR practitioners have a PR problem?: The effect of associating a source with public relations and client-negative news on audience perception of credibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1303_2.
Callison, C. (2004). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Perceptions of public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(4), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1604_3.
Christensen, L., & Cornelissen, J. (2015). Organizational transparency as myth and metaphor. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 132-149. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555256.
Christensen, L., & Langer, R. (2009). Public Relations and the strategic use of transparency: consistency, hypocrisy, and corporate change. In R. Heath, E. Toth, & D. Waymer, Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II (pp. 129-153). Routledge.
Ciszek, E. (2020). “We are people, not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003.
Cronin, A. (2020). The secrecy–transparency dynamic: A sociological reframing of secrecy and transparency for public relations research. Public Relations Inquiry, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20920800.
DeLorme, D., & Fedler, F. (2003). Journalists’ hostility toward public relations: an historical analysis. Public Relations Review, 29(2), 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(03)00019-5.
Edelman Trust Barometer (2018). www.edelman.com/.
Edelman Trust Barometer (2020). www.edelman.com/.
Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant?. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 389-404. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00366.x.
Flyverbom, M. (2016). Transparency: Mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication, 10, 110-122.
Fukuyama, F. (1996). Confiança. Valores sociais e criação de prosperidade. Gradiva.
Grunig, J., Grunig, L., Sriramesh, K., Huang, Y., & Lyra, A. (1995). Models of Public Relations in an international setting. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(3), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0703_01.
Holland, D., Krause, A., Provencher, J., & Seltzer, T. (2018). Transparency tested: the influence of message features on public perceptions of organizational transparency. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.12.002.
Hon, L., & Grunig, J. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. The Institute for PR. www.Instituteforpr.Org/research_single/guidelines_measuring_relationships.
Hung-Baesecke, C.-J., & Chen, Y.-R. (2020). Explicating trust and its relation to dialogue at a time of divided societies. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101890.
Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of Transparency. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 535-545. http://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400.
Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Relationships, transparency, and evaluation: the implications for public relations. In J. L’Étang, & Pieczka, M. (Eds.), Public Relations. Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice (pp. 61-91). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lane, A. (2020). The dialogic ladder: Toward a framework of dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101870.
Ledingham, J., & Bruning, S. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0363-8111(98)80020-9.
Macnamara, J. (2014). Journalism-PR relations revisited: the good news, the bad news, and insights into tomorrow’s news. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.002.
Moloney, K. (2005). Trust and public relations: center and edge. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.015.
Raaz, O., & Weheimer, S. (2016). Double deconstruction. Transparency, dialogue and social media from a critical post-structuralist perspective. In J. L’Étang, D. McKie, N. Snow, & J. Xifra (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations (pp. 173-185). Routledge.
Rawlins, B. (2007). Trust and PR practice. Institute for Public Relations.
Rawlins, B. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 2-22.
Rawlins, B. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71-99. http://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153421.
Saltzman, J. (2012). The image of the public relations practitioner in movies and television, 1901-2011. The IJPC Journal, (3), 1-50.
Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Cesaria, R. (2000). Measuring organizational trust: A diagnostic survey and international indicator. International Association of Business Communicators.
Shockley-Zalabak, P., Morreale, S., & Hackman, M. (2010). Building the high trust organization: Strategies for supporting five key dimensions of trust. Jossey-Bass.
Schnackenberg, A., & Tomlinson, E. (2016). Organizational Transparency: a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784-1810.
Sebastião, S., Saramago, M., & Range, S. (2016). A Relação com os Jornalistas e a Importância da Credibilidade e da Honestidade na Assessoria Mediática, em Portugal | The relationship with journalists and the importance of credibility and honesty in media relations, in Portugal. Comunicação Pública, 11(21), 1-14.
Tsetsura, K., Bentley, J., & Newcomb, T. (2015). Idealistic and conflicted: New portrayals of public relations practitioners in film. Public Relations Review, 41(5), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.018.
Valentini, C., & Kruckberg, K. (2011). Public relations and trust in contemporary society: A Luhmannian perspective of the role of Public Relations in enhancing trust among social systems. Central European Journal of Communication, 4(1), 91-107.
Vujnovic, M., & Kruckeberg, D. (2016). Pitfalls and promises of transparency in the digital age. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(2), 121-143.
Walker, D. (2008). Sustainability: Environmental management, transparency and competitive advantage. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 7(2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1057/rlp.2008.4.
Wall, S. (1996). Public Justification and the Transparency Argument. The Philosophical Quarterly, 46(185), 501-507.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wehmeier, S., & Winkler, P. (2013). Expanding the bridge, minimizing the gaps: public relations, organizational communication, and the idea that communication
constitutes organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 280-290.
Wehmeier, S., & Raaz, O. (2012). Transparency matters: The concept of organizational transparency in the academic discourse. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(3), 337-366.
Zaharna, R. (2010). Battles to bridges. US strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Estudos em Comunicação/Communication Studies is an Open Access journal. All its content is freely available without charge to the user or his institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Estudos em Comunicação, by Labcom, is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 3.0 Unported License. By submitting your work to Estudos em Comunicação/Communication studies you confirm you are the author and own the copyright, that the content is original and previously unpublished, and that you agree to the licensing terms.