Audiências e cross-media: estudo de padrões de consumo de notícias em Portugal
Keywords:
audiências, consumos noticiosos, repertórios mediáticos, Cross-Media, metodologia QAbstract
As práticas digitais que decorrem da ubiquidade dos media e da sua utilização possibilitaram a combinação de múltiplas plataformas no consumo de notícias. Neste artigo, procurámos identificar repertórios mediáticos (padrões de uso dos media noticiosos) em Portugal, de modo a compreender como são construídas as preferências mediáticas das audiências e de que forma o consumo noticioso integra os seus hábitos quotidianos. Neste sentido, desenvolvemos uma análise a padrões de consumo de media noticiosos a partir de uma abordagem mista de métodos qualitativos e quantitativos baseada na Metodologia Q (Davis & Michelle, 2011), a partir de uma amostra constituída por 36 participantes. A análise dos padrões de consumo de notícias permitiu identificar e analisar sete repertórios mediáticos em função do uso, relevância e utilidade atribuída pelos sujeitos aos media noticiosos. Os resultados revelam perfis híbridos de consumo mediático e uma tendência para consumos de notícias numa lógica móvel e multiplataforma, embora os media tradicionais continuem a desempenhar um papel determinante nos repertórios mediáticos em Portugal.
References
Amado, J. & Vieira, C. C. (2014). A validação da investigação qualitativa. In J. Amado (coord.), Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação (pp. 357-369). Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
Anacom (2015). Serviços móveis. Informação estatística. 1o trimestre de 2015. Disponível em: www.anacom.pt/streaming/SM_1T2015.pdf?contentId=1356833&field=ATTACHED_FILE
Correia, F. & Martins, C. (2017). Portugal – Media landscape. Disponível no site do European Journalism Centre (EJC) em: https://medialandscapes.org/country/pdf/portugal
Couldry, N.; Livingstone, S. & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: beyond the presumption of attention. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Couldry, N.; Livingstone, S. & Markham, T. (2008). ‘Public connection’ and the uncertain norms of media consumption. In K. Soper & F. Trentman (eds.), Citizenship and consumption (pp. 104-120). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Courtois, C.; Schrøder, K. C. & Kobbernagel, C. (2015). Exploring landscapes of news consump- tion cross-nationally. The use of Q methodology to fuse quantitative and qualitative appro- aches for increased explanatory power in comparative research. In F. Zeller, C. Ponte & B. O’Neill (eds.), Revitalising audience research. Innovations in European audience research (pp. 123-142). New York and London: Routledge.
Couto, M.; Farate, C.; Ramos, S. & Fleming, M. (2011). A metodologia Q nas ciências sociais e humanas: O resgate da subjetividade na investigação empírica. Psicologia, 25 (2): 7-21.
Davis, C. H. & Michelle, C. (2011). Q-methodology in audience research: bridging the qualita- tive/quantitative ‘divide’?. Participations, 8 (2): 527-561.
Deuze, M. (2014). Media life and the mediatization of the lifeworld. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz (eds.), Mediatized worlds: culture and society in a media age (pp. 207-220). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
ERC (2015). Públicos e consumos de media: O consumo de notícias e as plataformas digitais em Portugal e em mais dez países. Disponível em: www.erc.pt/pt/estudos-e-publicacoes/consum os-de-media/estudo-publicos-e-consumos-de-media.
ERC (2016). As novas dinâmicas do consumo audiovisual em Portugal. Disponível em: www.erc.p t/documentos/Estudos/ConsumoAVemPT/index.html.
Figueiras, R. (2017a). Primetime consociation: Portuguese punditry in-between media inde- pendence and political patronage. European Journal of Communication, 32 (4): 312-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117710899
Figueiras, R. (2017b). A mediatização da política na era das redes sociais. Lisboa: Alêtheia.
Figueiras, R. (2014). O sistema dos media em Portugal no contexto da globalização do século XXI. In I. F. Cunha & E. Serrano (eds.), Cobertura jornalística da corrupção política: Sistemas políticos, sistemas mediáticos e enquadramentos legais (pp. 176-195). Lisboa: Aletheia.
Figueiras, R. & Ribeiro, N. (2013). New global flows of capital in media industries after the 2008 financial crisis: The Angola-Portugal relationship. The International Journal of Press/Poli- tics, 18 (4): 508-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213496583
Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing media systems beyond the Western World. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hasebrink, U. & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A con- ceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31: 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.023
Höijer, B. (2008). Ontological assumptions and generalizations in qualitative (Audience) research. European Journal of Communication, 23: 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108092 536
Katz, E.; Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37 (4): 509-523.
Kobbernagel, C. & Schrøder, K. C. (2016). From everyday communicative figuration to rigorous audience news repertoires. A mixed method approach to cross-media news consumption. MedieKultur, 60: 6-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.21302
Lee, H. & Yang, J. (2014). Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. International Journal of Communication, 8: 597-617.
Martinho, A. & Cardoso, G. (2017). Portugal. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos, D. A. L. Levy & R. K. Nielsen (eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Nielsen, R. K. (2014). Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunities. MedieKultur, 56: 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712
Nielsen, R. K. & Schrøder, K. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. An eight-country cross-media comparison. Digital Jour- nalism, 2 (4): 472-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.872420
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the internet world- wide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OBERCOM (2015). Anuário da comunicação 2015. Disponível em https://obercom.pt/wp-content/ uploads/2016/06/Anu%C3%A1rio-da-Comunica%C3%A7%C3%A3o-2014-2015.pdf.
Patterson, T. (2003). Tendências do jornalismo contemporâneo. Estarão as notícias leves e o jornalismo crítico a enfraquecer a democracia?. Media & Jornalismo, 2 (2): 19-47. Coimbra: Minerva.
Perusko, Z.; Vozab, D. & Cuvalo, A. (2013). Audiences as a source of agency in media systems: Post-socialist Europe in comparative perspective. Media Studies, 11: 137-154.
Peters, C. (2016). Spaces and places of news consumption. Authors’ accepted manuscript. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo & A. Hermida (eds.), The Sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 354-369). London: Sage.
Santos, S. C. (2013). Do insucesso do DAB à expansão online: A estratégia digital da rádio pública portuguesa. Observatório (OBS*), 7 (2): 161-181.
Schrøder, K. C. (2012). Methodological pluralism as a vehicle of qualitative generalization. Par- ticipations, 9 (2): 798-825.
Schrøder, K. C. (2015a, May). Audiences’ news media repertoires as resources for public con- nection. Preliminary report from a cross-national comparative study. Paper presented at the ICA Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Schrøder, K. C. (2015b). Antigas e novas notícias: Audiências flutuantes, repertórios noticiosos e locais de consumo. Parágrafo, 2 (3): 125-139.
Schrøder, K. C. (2015c). News media old and new - Fluctuating audiences, news repertoires and locations of consumption. Journalism Studies, 16 (1): 60-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461 670X.2014.890332
Schrøder, K. C. (2012). Methodological pluralism as a vehicle of qualitative generalization. Par- ticipations, 9 (2): 798-825.
Schrøder, K. C. & Kobbernagel, C. (2010). Towards a typology of cross-media news consumption: a qualitative-quantitative synthesis. Northern Lights, 8: 115-138.
Schrøder, K. C. (1999). The best of both worlds? Media audience research between rival para- digms’. In P. Alasuutari (ed.), Rethinking the media audience (pp. 38-68). London: Sage.
Swart, J.; Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (2016). Navigating cross-media news use. Media re- pertoires and the value of news in everyday life. Journalism Studies (online first): 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1129285
Van Damme, K. (no prelo). In Flanders fields. News media repertoires in Dutch-speaking Bel- gium. Participations.
Van Dijk, J. v. (2012). The evolution of the digital divide – the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In J. Bus, M. Crompton, M. Hildebrandt & G. Metakides (eds.), Digital enlightenment yearbook (pp. 57-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westlund, O. (2015). News consumption in an age of mobile media: Patterns, people, place, and participation. Mobile Media & Communication, 3 (2): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050 157914563369
Woodstock, L. (2014). The news-democracy narrative and the unexpected benefits of limited news consumption: the case of news resisters. Journalism, 15 (7): 834-849. https://doi.org/10.1177 /1464884913504260
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Estudos em Comunicação/Communication Studies is an Open Access journal. All its content is freely available without charge to the user or his institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Estudos em Comunicação, by Labcom, is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 3.0 Unported License. By submitting your work to Estudos em Comunicação/Communication studies you confirm you are the author and own the copyright, that the content is original and previously unpublished, and that you agree to the licensing terms.