Digital Ads and the Adblocking in Portugal – To appropriate or not to appropriate, that is the question
Keywords:
adblockers, adblocking in portugal, motives of adblockers’ appropriation, digital literacies, challenges for the mediaAbstract
The operative dynamics of the contemporary media sector are, in the digital age, increasingly susceptible to new tensions. On the part of financial structure and business models, few phenomena will be as relevant to investigate as the use of adblocking software, which has been increasing consistingly. This article addresses this issue in two ways: a) a theoretical review with a focus on the most recent and still scarce literature and b) to test the relevance of these contributions in the portuguese case based on an exploratory study to a non-probabilistic sample. The relevance of this approach is related to the need to understand a phenomenon that has in Portugal, like the rest of the world, a strong impact both in the sector’s business models and in the relationship of Internet users with informative content. The theoretical review and data analysis demonstrate the rele- vance of the subject as well as the increasing tension between companies, content and users in the context of increasingly common and easy to operate technological resources in digital ecosystems. The increase of the digital critical literacy index coincides with the users’ awareness of concepts such as identity, privacy and content relevance.
References
Bath, F. (2015). Ad blocking’s unintended consequences. Harvard Business Review. Link: https://hbr.org/2015/08/ad-blockings-unintended-consequences
Beckett, C. (2010). The value of networked journalism. Polis Journalism and Society. London School of Economics and Political Science: UK.
Clark, B. (2017). Princeton University is developing an undetectable ad blocker. Business insider. Link: www.businessinsider.com/princeton-university-is-developing-an-undetectable- ad-blocker-2017-4
Crites, J. & Ricken, M. (s.d.). Automatic adblocking: improving adblock for the mozilla platform. ResearchGate net publication.
Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6/4, 442.64. Sage Publications.
Digital TV Research (2017). Online TV piracy forecasts. Link: www.digitaltvresearch.com/products/product?id=190
Fenton, N. (2010). News in the digital age. In The Routledge companion to news and journalism (p. 557). Routledge: UK.
Fidalgo, J. (2008). O jornalista em construção. Porto: Porto Editora.
Hague, C. & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab.
Ikram, M. & Kaafar, M. A. (2017). A first look at mobile ad-blocking apps. ResearchGate net publication.
Iqbal, U. et al (2017). The adwars: retrospective measurement and analysis of anti-adblock filter lists. The 2017 Internet Measurement Conference. DOI 10.1145/3131365.3131387.
Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, August, 15(6), 836-866. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Livingstone, S. et al (2011). Digital literacy and safety skills. LSE. Research online. KPMG (2016). Re-evaluate ad spend. The numbers behind the adblocking war. Link: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/re-evaluate-ad-spend.pdf
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. 2. ed. New York, Harper & Row.
Mughees, M. H. & Shafiq, Z. (2017). Detecting anti ad-blockers in the wild. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, (3), 130-146.
Newman, N. (2016). Journalism, media and technology predictions. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-resea rch/journalism-media-and-technology-trends-and-predictions-2018
Newman, N. et al (2016). Reuters digital news report 2016. Reuters Institute for the Study of Jour- nalism, University of Oxford. Link: http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ research/files/Digital%2520News%2520Report%25202016.pdf
Newman, N. et al (2017). Reuters digital news report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/file s/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf
Nithyanad, R. et al (2016). Adblocking and counter-blocking: a slice of the Arms Race. ResearchGate net publication.
OVUM – TMT Intelligence (2017). Ad-blocking forecast 2016-21. Link: https://ovum.informa.com /resources/product-content/me0002-000774
PageFair (2013). The rise of adblocking. Link: https://downloads.pagefair.com/downloads/2016/0 5/The-Rise-of-Adblocking.pdf
Picard, R. G. (2015). Journalists’ perceptions of the future of journalistic work. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Plummer, L. (2017). Google to launch chrome ad-blocker in early 2018, warns publishers to prepare. Link: www.wired.co.uk/article/google-chrome-ad-blocker
Queuniet, V. et al (2011). Les entreprises de presse face aux évolutions numériques. Délégation Générale à L ́emploi et à la formation professionnelle.
Rath, J. (2017). Industry-wide ad blocking could finally acknowledge that online advertising has problems. Business Insider. Link www.businessinsider.com/industry-wide-ad-blocking-is- big-benefit-for-google-and-facebook-2017-4
Rothenberg, R. (2015). Ad blocking: the unnecessary internet apocalypse - the ad industry ne- eds to disrupt the disruptors. AdAge. Link: http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/ad-blocking-
unnecessary-internet-apocalypse/300470/
Shiller, B. & Waldfogel, J. (2017). The impact of ad blockers on the internet. Vox Cepr ́s Policy Portal. Link: http://voxeu.org/article/impact-ad-blockers-internet
Singer, J. (2008). The journalist in the network. A shifting rationale for the gatekeeping role and the objectivity norm. Tripodos, 23, 61-76.
Storey, G.; Narayanan, A.; Reisman, D. & Mayer, J. (2017). The future of ad blocking: an analytical frameworks and new techniques. Link: http://randomwalker.info/publications/ad- blocking-framework-techniques.pdf
TailWind (2016). Adblocking in Greece. Study on the use of ad blocking and consumers’ stance towards online advertising. Link: http://tailwindemea.net/AdBlockingGreece/AdBlockingGr eece2016.pdf
Thomas, J. (2017). Programming, filtering, adblocking: an advertising and media automation. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, 166(1), 1329878-1773878.
Tillman, R. & Kirkpatrick, C. A. (1972). Promotion; persuasive communication in marketing (p. 94). Homewood, BL, Richard D. Irwin.
Scott, M. (2016). Rise of ad-blocking software threatens online revenue. Link: www.nytimes.com/ 2016/05/31/business/international/smartphone-ad-blocking-software-mobile.html
Vratonjic, N.; Manshaei M. H.; Grossklags J. & Hubaux, J. P. (2013). Ad-blocking games: mone- tizing online content under the threat of ad avoidance. In R. Böhme (eds.), The economics of information security and privacy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Waisbord, S. (2013). Reinventing professionalism – journalism and news in global perspective. UK: Polity Press.
Zelizer, B. (2015). Terms of choice: uncertainty, journalism and crisis. Journal of Communication. doi:10.1111/jcom.12157. International Communication Association.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Estudos em Comunicação/Communication Studies is an Open Access journal. All its content is freely available without charge to the user or his institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Estudos em Comunicação, by Labcom, is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 3.0 Unported License. By submitting your work to Estudos em Comunicação/Communication studies you confirm you are the author and own the copyright, that the content is original and previously unpublished, and that you agree to the licensing terms.