Transtornos e tumulto, ou uma grande festa da democracia? Contrastes da cobertura jornalística audiovisual da greve geral de 28 de abril no Brasil pelos média tradicional e alternativo
Palavras-chave:
paradigma do protesto, jornalismo tradicional, jornalismo alternativo, objetividade jornalística.Resumo
A cobertura jornalística de manifestações e protestos populares tende a enfatizar aspetos negativos do evento, como demonstram estudos relacionados ao paradigma do protesto. Por sua vez, a fragmentação do ecossistema mediático impulsionada pelas redes sociais digitais tem feito com que outras narrativas sobre um mesmo evento venham à tona e disputem as representações acerca deste tipo de acontecimento. Foi o que aconteceu na greve geral realizada no Brasil no dia 28 de abril de 2017. Neste estudo, proponho uma análise descritiva e comparativa de reportagens audiovisuais produzidas por dois dos principais telejornais brasileiros, o Jornal Nacional e o Jornal da Record, e produções em vídeo de quatro meios alternativos com difusão pelo Facebook, Jornalistas Livres, Coletivo Nigéria, Marco Zero Conteúdo e Coletivo Catarse. O objetivo é perceber as estratégias discursivas empregadas por cada um deles para construir as narrativas jornalísticas audiovisuais, dando verossimilhança aos relatos ainda que fincados em vieses bem evidentes. Entre as conclusões, nota-se que os meios tradicionais buscaram realçar sua legitimidade a partir das vozes de pessoas comuns, enquanto os meios alternativos fortaleceram fontes contra-oficiais, sobretudo sindi- calistas, marcando sua posição institucionalmente ao lado dos interesses dos trabalhadores.
Referências
Atton, C. (2011). Alternative journalism. In J. D. H. Downing (ed.), Encyclopedia of social movement media. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Atton, C. & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism (1st ed.). London: S. Publications Ed.
Atton, C. & Wickenden, E. (2005). Sourcing routines and representations in alternative journa- lism: a case study approach. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 347-359. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.108 0/14616700500132008
Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change (14), 125-136.
Boyle, M. P.; McLeod, D. M. & Armstrong, C. L. (2012). Adherence to the protest paradigm: the influence of protest goals and tactics on news coverage in US and international newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 127-144.
Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007
Carpentier, N. & Trioen, M. (2010). The particularity of objectivity: a post-structuralist and psy- choanalytical reading of the gap between objectivity-as-a-value and objectivity-as-a-practice in the 2003 Iraqi War coverage. Journalism, 11(3), 311-328. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1 464884909360922
Chan, J. M. & Lee, C.-C. (1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: a case study of Hong Kong. The news media in national and international conflict, 183-202.
Charaudeau, P. (2006). Discurso das mídias (Trans. A. M. S.Corrêa). São Paulo: Contexto.
Dardis, F. E. (2006). Marginalization devices in U.S. Press coverage of Iraq war protest: A content analysis. Mass Communication & Society, 9(2), 117-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s153 27825mcs0902_1
Deuze, M. (2005). What is Journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsi- dered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
Fauzanafi, M. Z. & Halaman, K. (2015). ‘We don’t work with video, we work with People’: reflections on participatory video activism in Indonesia. The Fibreculture Journal, (26), 314- 320.
Forde, S. (2011). Challenging the news: the journalism of alternative and community media. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Hall, S. (1978). The social production of news. In S. Hall (ed.), Policing the crisis: mugging the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Press.
Harcup, T. (2003). The unspoken – said’: the journalism of alternative media. Journalism, 4(3), 356-376. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14648849030043006
Harcup, T. (2015). Listening to the voiceless: the practices and ethics of alternative journalism. In C. Atton (ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media. London: Routledge.
Harlow, S. (2017). Recognizing the importance of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1364139
Harlow, S.; Salaverría, R.; Kilgo, D. K. & García-Perdomo, V. (2017). Protest paradigm in multi- media: social media sharing of coverage about the crime of Ayotzinapa, Mexico. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 328-349. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12296
Hopke, J. E. (2012). Water gives life: framing an environmental justice movement in the mains- tream and alternative salvadoran press. Environmental Communication-a Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(3), 365-382. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.695742
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: Bloomsbury Academic.
Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Triggering the protest paradigm: examinins factors affecting news coverage of protests. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2725-2746.
Machin, D. & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis – a multimodal introduction. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: Sage.
McLeod, D. M. & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of communication, 49(3), 3-23.
Moretzsohn, S. (2002). “Profissionalismo” e “objetividade”: o jornalismo na contramão da polí- tica. In L. G. Motta (ed.), Imprensa e poder (pp. 199-216). Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics – thinking the world politically. London, New York: Verso.
O’Halloran, K. & Smith, B. (2011). Multimodal studies. In K.
O’Halloran & B. Smith (ed.),
Multimodal studies – exploring issues and domains. London, New York: Routledge.
Reul, R.; Paulussen, S.; Raeijmaekers, D.; van der Steen, L. & Maeseele, P. (2016). Professi- onal journalistic routines and the protest paradigm: the Big Potato Swap in traditional and alternative media. Journalism, 1-18.
Rodriguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: an international study of citizens’ media. Hampton Press.
Rodriguez, C.; Ferron, B. & Shamas, K. (2014). Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. Media Culture & Society, 36(2), 150-166.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism Journalism, 2 (2), 149-170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Shahin, S.; Zheng, P.; Sturm, H. A. & Fadnis, D. (2016). Protesting the paradigm: a comparative study of news coverage of protests in Brazil, China, and India. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 143-164. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19401616631114
Sousa, A. L. N. & Cervi, L. (2017). Video activism in the Brazilian protests: genres, narratives and political participation. Northern Lights, 15, 69-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/nl.15.69_1
Sponholz, L. (2003). Objetividade em jornalismo: uma perspectiva da teoria do conhecimento. Famecos, (21), 110-120.
Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: an examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77 (4), 660-679.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Racism and the press: Taylor & Francis.
Weaver, D. A. & Scacco, J. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: the tea party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61-84.
