Transtornos e tumulto, ou uma grande festa da democracia? Contrastes da cobertura jornalística audiovisual da greve geral de 28 de abril no Brasil pelos média tradicional e alternativo
Resumo
A cobertura jornalística de manifestações e protestos populares tende a enfatizar aspetos negativos do evento, como demonstram estudos relacionados ao paradigma do protesto. Por sua vez, a fragmentação do ecossistema mediático impulsionada pelas redes sociais digitais tem feito com que outras narrativas sobre um mesmo evento venham à tona e disputem as representações acerca deste tipo de acontecimento. Foi o que aconteceu na greve geral realizada no Brasil no dia 28 de abril de 2017. Neste estudo, proponho uma análise descritiva e comparativa de reportagens audiovisuais produzidas por dois dos principais telejornais brasileiros, o Jornal Nacional e o Jornal da Record, e produções em vídeo de quatro meios alternativos com difusão pelo Facebook, Jornalistas Livres, Coletivo Nigéria, Marco Zero Conteúdo e Coletivo Catarse. O objetivo é perceber as estratégias discursivas empregadas por cada um deles para construir as narrativas jornalísticas audiovisuais, dando verossimilhança aos relatos ainda que fincados em vieses bem evidentes. Entre as conclusões, nota-se que os meios tradicionais buscaram realçar sua legitimidade a partir das vozes de pessoas comuns, enquanto os meios alternativos fortaleceram fontes contra-oficiais, sobretudo sindi- calistas, marcando sua posição institucionalmente ao lado dos interesses dos trabalhadores.
Palavras-chave
Texto Completo:
PDFReferências
Atton, C. (2011). Alternative journalism. In J. D. H. Downing (ed.), Encyclopedia of social movement media. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Atton, C. & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism (1st ed.). London: S. Publications Ed.
Atton, C. & Wickenden, E. (2005). Sourcing routines and representations in alternative journa- lism: a case study approach. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 347-359. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.108 0/14616700500132008
Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change (14), 125-136.
Boyle, M. P.; McLeod, D. M. & Armstrong, C. L. (2012). Adherence to the protest paradigm: the influence of protest goals and tactics on news coverage in US and international newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 127-144.
Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007
Carpentier, N. & Trioen, M. (2010). The particularity of objectivity: a post-structuralist and psy- choanalytical reading of the gap between objectivity-as-a-value and objectivity-as-a-practice in the 2003 Iraqi War coverage. Journalism, 11(3), 311-328. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1 464884909360922
Chan, J. M. & Lee, C.-C. (1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: a case study of Hong Kong. The news media in national and international conflict, 183-202.
Charaudeau, P. (2006). Discurso das mídias (Trans. A. M. S.Corrêa). São Paulo: Contexto.
Dardis, F. E. (2006). Marginalization devices in U.S. Press coverage of Iraq war protest: A content analysis. Mass Communication & Society, 9(2), 117-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s153 27825mcs0902_1
Deuze, M. (2005). What is Journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsi- dered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
Fauzanafi, M. Z. & Halaman, K. (2015). ‘We don’t work with video, we work with People’: reflections on participatory video activism in Indonesia. The Fibreculture Journal, (26), 314- 320.
Forde, S. (2011). Challenging the news: the journalism of alternative and community media. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Hall, S. (1978). The social production of news. In S. Hall (ed.), Policing the crisis: mugging the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Press.
Harcup, T. (2003). The unspoken – said’: the journalism of alternative media. Journalism, 4(3), 356-376. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14648849030043006
Harcup, T. (2015). Listening to the voiceless: the practices and ethics of alternative journalism. In C. Atton (ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media. London: Routledge.
Harlow, S. (2017). Recognizing the importance of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1364139
Harlow, S.; Salaverría, R.; Kilgo, D. K. & García-Perdomo, V. (2017). Protest paradigm in multi- media: social media sharing of coverage about the crime of Ayotzinapa, Mexico. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 328-349. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12296
Hopke, J. E. (2012). Water gives life: framing an environmental justice movement in the mains- tream and alternative salvadoran press. Environmental Communication-a Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(3), 365-382. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.695742
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: Bloomsbury Academic.
Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Triggering the protest paradigm: examinins factors affecting news coverage of protests. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2725-2746.
Machin, D. & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis – a multimodal introduction. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: Sage.
McLeod, D. M. & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of communication, 49(3), 3-23.
Moretzsohn, S. (2002). “Profissionalismo” e “objetividade”: o jornalismo na contramão da polí- tica. In L. G. Motta (ed.), Imprensa e poder (pp. 199-216). Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics – thinking the world politically. London, New York: Verso.
O’Halloran, K. & Smith, B. (2011). Multimodal studies. In K.
O’Halloran & B. Smith (ed.),
Multimodal studies – exploring issues and domains. London, New York: Routledge.
Reul, R.; Paulussen, S.; Raeijmaekers, D.; van der Steen, L. & Maeseele, P. (2016). Professi- onal journalistic routines and the protest paradigm: the Big Potato Swap in traditional and alternative media. Journalism, 1-18.
Rodriguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: an international study of citizens’ media. Hampton Press.
Rodriguez, C.; Ferron, B. & Shamas, K. (2014). Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. Media Culture & Society, 36(2), 150-166.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism Journalism, 2 (2), 149-170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Shahin, S.; Zheng, P.; Sturm, H. A. & Fadnis, D. (2016). Protesting the paradigm: a comparative study of news coverage of protests in Brazil, China, and India. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 143-164. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19401616631114
Sousa, A. L. N. & Cervi, L. (2017). Video activism in the Brazilian protests: genres, narratives and political participation. Northern Lights, 15, 69-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/nl.15.69_1
Sponholz, L. (2003). Objetividade em jornalismo: uma perspectiva da teoria do conhecimento. Famecos, (21), 110-120.
Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: an examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77 (4), 660-679.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Racism and the press: Taylor & Francis.
Weaver, D. A. & Scacco, J. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: the tea party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61-84.
Apontadores
- Não há apontadores.
Licença URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.pt_PT
